The Heir to Blade Runner
In anticipation for Blade Runner: 2049 I recently returned to one of my all time
favourite films Blade Runner. It was
such a major film at the time and its legacy still continues to this date. That
said, I would still refer to this film as underrated. Almost forty years later
the film still looks fantastic. The cyber-punk/future noir style has been
nothing short of revolutionary. In alignment with that the film had
philosophical depth as a result of inspiration from Philip K. Dick. Ever so
rarely does a film amount with both style and substance on such a grand scale.
Having previously worked on Alien, at
the time it felt like Ridley Scott could do no wrong. He earned himself the
reputation as the father of dark science fiction cinema. Years on Ridley Scott
remains a legend but it feels as though his golden age has passed. He shifted
away from the science fiction genre in an attempt to make other big
blockbusters (like Gladiator) and
films that would appeal more to the Academy Awards (American Gangster). Only recently has he returned to sci-fi and the
reactions have been mixed. The highly anticipated Prometheus came as a disappointment for many hardcore Ridley Scott
fans that thought of it as convoluted. Ridley Scott’s 2015 film The Martian was a pleasant surprise as a
light and entertaining sci-fi film but still it lacked any major change and
that prevented it from being a classic. The 2017 return to the Alien franchise titled Alien: Covenant had the same redeeming
qualities but ultimately failed to break new ground yet again. Because of all
this, when I discovered Denis Villeneuve (director of the critically acclaimed Awake) was directing Blade Runner: 2049 I thought it was for
the best.
So it seems that Ridley Scott worked best
in 70s/80s because it was an era that resonated well with his grimy
future-retro aesthetic. I don’t watch Blade
Runner because I think it is realistic and therefore intriguing
representation of the future. I watch it because it is a hypnotic and
imaginative view of the future. Some might say it was a dystopian film but I
find the film to be highly engrossing nonetheless. There are things that don’t
make a great deal of sense in a modern context such as the glass-screened
computers with blocky pixels. Things like this don’t reflect reality but they
draw me in. The release of Blade Runner
had even caused stress for pioneering cyberpunk author William Gibson. At the
time of Blade Runner’s release,
William Gibson was writing his now classic novel Neuromancer. Blade Runner
was a project that both excited and intimidated Gibson as he thought it would
reveal the aesthetic of a cyberpunk world even better than he could possibly
describe. Fortunately for Gibson, Neuromancer
succeeded in its own right but his feelings towards Blade Runner were not without basis. It is a film that heavily
depends on the visual experience and Ridley Scott was aware of this. Part of
what made Blade Runner a classic is
the time it was created. We could never expect another film like it and I
wouldn’t want to. I am yet to see Blade
Runner: 2049 but what I want is an entirely new film that takes inspiration
from Blade Runner. With Denis
Villeneuve directing, I have a good feeling that he will bring a breath of
fresh air to the Blade Runner
universe.
Comments
Post a Comment